Time for a ‘defensive’ portfolio?


With the election of Donald Trump as U.S. president, many investors believe that a new era of political uncertainty is going to increase stock market volatility. And that leads to questions about whether it makes sense to rebalance portfolios, especially those that hold aggressive growth-oriented mutual funds and ETFs, to a more defensive tilt. Before hitting those sell buttons, stop for a moment, and think about what you actually mean by “defensive” and “aggressive,” and what making those changes would mean.

When I’m asked about “defensive” or “aggressive” funds, it usually has to do with relative levels of risk that an investor is willing to accept (with “volatility” being a key metric here).

article continues below

Some fund categories can be construed as perhaps less risky and more “defensive” than others. For instance, money market funds are considered ultra-conservative and virtually risk-free, because they invest in highly liquid short-term government Treasury bills. Their unit values generally don’t fluctuate. The flip side is that money market funds pay out virtually nothing and may even produce a negative yield once you factor in tax and inflation.

Fixed-income funds are slightly more risky than the ultra-defensive money market funds, and typically provide a better return. That’s because bond prices and yields can change depending on both the prevailing level of interest rates and on interest rate expectations.

Equities can produce the largest gains and losses, and wide swings in volatility, and are thus are not generally considered “defensive” as an asset class (although within equity portfolios, the term “defensive” is frequently used to describe stocks that may be relatively less volatile, owing to their status as shares of large, blue-chip, dividend paying companies).

Playing it smart

Given the election results and all the subsequent media hype of recent days, you may be tempted to reallocate to “defensive” fixed-income funds and hold more cash in the form of money market funds. But that would be committing the cardinal portfolio sin of managing by emotion. No one can say what a Trump presidency will bring, any more than anyone could have said what an Obama presidency would bring when he was first elected.

In addition, by buying, selling, rebalancing, and reallocating, you’re not only generating costs in the form of brokerage commissions, but you may very well be inadvertently accumulating a hefty tax bill on the various buys and sells of your investments through the year. It all takes a sizeable chunk out of your investment returns and puts it in someone else’s pocket. There’s probably no other activity in the world where individuals will so eagerly perform a robbery on themselves.

It is far more prudent to approach your portfolio decisions from a perspective that looks at overall asset allocation, tax-efficiency, and cost. By this, I mean you should decide honestly about your level of risk tolerance. Then construct a diversified portfolio comprising safety, income, and growth assets in various proportions that reflect your risk comfort level. And stick with it. The key is to step back from the daily noise of the trading screen for long enough to take a look at your whole portfolio. And then ask yourself:

* Is it tax efficient?Am I attracting maximum tax with every transaction or am I minimizing the tax hit? Am I maximizing my use of Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs) and Registered Retirement Savings Plans?

* Is it low cost?Am I using investment strategies that reduce my overall trading, transaction, and management costs, such as allocating at least some portion of my asset mix to low-cost exchange-traded funds?

* Am I mitigating risk?Am I diversifying my portfolio with enough non-correlated asset classes to suit my tolerance for risk? Am I using hedging or income-generating strategies with options? Or am I essentially “throwing darts” every day, and hoping for the best?

These are not particularly easy questions to answer, and you might just have to consult a financial advisor to help you get and keep your investments on the right – tax efficient – track. And that’s the best “defensive” strategy of all.

Courtesy Fundata Canada Inc. © 2016. Robyn Thompson, CFP, CIM, FCSI, is president of Castlemark Wealth Management. This article is not intended as personalized advice. Securities mentioned are not guaranteed and carry risk of loss. No promise of performance is made or implied.

© Copyright Battlefords News Optimist


NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Battlefords News-Optimist welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus